Norbert Gombos vs Vito Tonejc Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 11 May at 12:37 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
N. Gombos vs V. Tonejc

 SVK
1
Win
Played
0
Win

 CRO
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Gombos 1 - 0 Tonejc
They have played 3 sets in total, with Norbert Gombos winning 2 and Vito Tonejc winning 1. The last match between Norbert Gombos and Vito Tonejc was at the Zagreb Challenger, 11-05-2025, Round: Q1, Surface: Clay, with Norbert Gombos getting the victory 6-2 5-7 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins | 
|---|---|
| Gombos | 1 | 
| Tonejc | 0 | 
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q1) Zagreb Challenger(05-11-25)
N. Gombos vs V. Tonejc H2H Profile
N. Gombos vs V. Tonejc Match Preview:
- Is second serve performance impactful in predicting the outcome? Yes, Gombos recently won 47.51% on their second serve, slightly better than Tonejc at 43.88%.
 - In return games, Gombos secured 48.35% of points on opponents' second serves compared to Tonejc's 38.73%, giving Gombos an edge.
 - Examining first serve returns, Gombos again leads slightly with 26.53% over Tonejc's 23.09%.
 - Under pressure, Tonejc saved 55.77% of breakpoints, outperforming Gombos who saved 50.46%.
 - Their performance record in the past year shows Gombos with a 59.09% win rate and Tonejc at 58.97%, showing they are closely matched.
 - Gombos excels on clay with a 59% career win rate, whereas Tonejc performs best on hard courts winning 64% of the time.
 - Considering tournament levels, Gombos mainly plays in Challengers/ITF events > $10K and Tonejc in Futures/ITF events $10K.
 - Gombos' opponents had an average rank of 365.7, while Tonejc faced stronger competition with an average rank of 239.46.
 - In deciding sets, Tonejc has a remarkable 75% win rate compared to Gombos' 52%, offering Tonejc a psychological advantage.
 - Break point conversion rates show Gombos at 40.26% and Tonejc significantly lower at 21.62%.
 
Editorial Prediction (May 11, 2025, UTC):
Gombos appears to have a consistent edge in second serve performance and return points, which are both crucial areas for gaining the upper hand in a match. These strengths can provide him with the ability to control rallies and put pressure on Tonejc.
Although Tonejc demonstrates an impressive ability to handle pressure by saving more breakpoints, his lower second serve points won and break point conversion rates might impede his efforts to establish dominance.
Given Tonejc's superior performance in deciding sets, if the match extends to this point, he may gain an upper hand. However, brandishing a better break point conversion rate and proficiency in key return aspects, Gombos is slightly more favorable to emerge as the winner.
Taking into account the entirety of the stats, Gombos is marginally more likely to clinch the victory in this upcoming face-off.
Norbert Gombos vs Vito Tonejc Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
N. Gombos vs V. Tonejc H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 | 
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 | 
| 17 | Games Won | 12 | 
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 3 | 
| 4 | Total Double Faults | 0 | 
| 2:2:55 | Average Match Time | 2:2:55 | 
| 65% (60/93) | 1st Serve % | 66% (54/82) | 
| 77% (46/60) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (33/54) | 
| 45% (15/33) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (13/28) | 
| 63% (5/8) | Break Pts Won % | 33% (3/9) | 
| 44% (36/82) | Return Points Win % | 34% (32/93) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) | 
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) | 
Recent Performance Stats
N. Gombos Recent Matches Played
V. Tonejc Recent Matches Played

N. Gombos vs V. Tonejc Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 56.59% (580/445) | YTD Win/Loss | 57.48% (73/54) | 
| 54.95% (1343/1101) | Sets Win/Loss | 55.83% (158/125) | 
| 52.08% (12344/11359) | Games Win/Loss | 52.26% (1412/1290) | 
| 56.11% (124/97) | Hard Win/Loss | 63.64% (35/20) | 
| 58.75% (292/205) | Clay Win/Loss | 45.00% (18/22) | 
| 54.58% (155/129) | Indoor Hard W/L | 62.50% (20/12) | 
| 39.13% (9/14) | Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 
| 0.36 | Aces Per Game | 0.24 | 
| 4119 | Aces Total | 316 | 
| 0.24 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.13 | 
| 2817 | Total Double Faults | 173 | 
| 1:18:39 | Average Match Time | 1:20:25 | 
| 537.72 | Average Opponent Rank | 336.68 | 
| 60% (35845/59530) | 1st Serve % | 67% (4575/6802) | 
| 72% (25806/35845) | 1st Serve Win % | 66% (3010/4575) | 
| 50% (11778/23679) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (1133/2227) | 
| 40% (2272/5688) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (285/730) | 
| 39% (23347/60496) | Return Points Win % | 40% (2776/7009) | 
| 46.27% (31/36) | Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 51.72% (15/14) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 39.13% (9/14) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 49.21% (62/64) | Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 
| 57.22% (329/246) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/2) | 
| 65.69% (134/70) | Futures W/L | 58.40% (73/52) | 
| 57% (563/989) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (72/125) | 
| 36% (10/28) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) | 
| 52% (205/396) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 48% (12/25) | 
| 53% (189/359) | Deciding Set Win % | 59% (19/32) | 
| 84% (572/480) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 91% (74/67) | 
| 16% (572/92) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 9% (74/7) | 
| 22% (451/99) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (53/7) |